The 2020 Election

In November and December of 2023, The Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports conducted a landmark survey of U.S. voters in an attempt to definitively assess the degree of fraudulent voting that occurred in the 2020 election.

Findings include:
21% of mail-in voters admitted that in 2020 they voted in a state where they are “no longer a permanent resident.”
21% of mail-in voters admitted that they filled out a ballot for a friend or family member.
17% of mail-in voters said they signed a ballot for a friend or family member “with or without his or her permission.”
19% of mail-in voters said that a friend or family member filled out their ballot, in part or in full, on their behalf.
8% of all voters said that a “friend, family member, or organization, such as a political party,” offered to pay or reward them for voting.

Survey results suggest that one-in-five mail-in ballots cast were likely fraudulent. Shockingly, this is a conservative estimate.

The policy brief pdf is here.

Censorship Industrial Complex

President and former Supreme Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about the Military Industrial Complex. We ignored him.

Today, we have the Censorship Industrial Complex. It’s far worse and ignored just the same. Free speech is chilled, privacy is annulled and security is dismantled. Since we’ve buried our heads in the sand for so long, how can we tell ourselves we don’t deserve it?

When it comes to censorship, everyone’s in on it: think tanks, academia, big tech and Uncle Sugar. This is why you might not perceive it so well—or worse, why you might take it for granted. It’s not a parochial phenom, it’s coordinated and multifaceted: a well-oiled global machine.

This pictograph is part of the “citizen’s starter kit to understanding the new global information cartel.”

source: https://www.racket.news/p/report-on-the-censorship-industrial-74b?publication_id=1042

ref: https://archive.is/RKJ3F

Covid Safety Data

When the CDC created V-Safe as a way to track individuals who received the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines,” the agency vowed to be completely transparent. Remember—despite forcing millions of frightened human beings to take the jab—there were subpar clinical trials.

The free-text entries are critical because, shockingly, despite having an index of “adverse events of special interest” listed in its protocol, V-Safe entirely omitted those same adverse events from being tracked. As explained by ICAN, instead of asking V-safe participants about whether, for example, they experienced things such as anaphylaxis, myocarditis, or coagulopathy after taking an entirely experimental “vaccine” based on technology never before used, the CDC carelessly deliberately only asked about minor and generalized reactions, such as “chills,” “headache,” “fatigue or tiredness,” and “vomiting.”

(permanent archive at https://archive.is/r94do)

Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic

Origin: Feb 5, 2010, 04:35pm EST by Michael Fumento

The World Health Organization (WHO) has suddenly gone from crying “The sky is falling!” like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. “The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible,” the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this “description,” but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.”

Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. “We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health,” he said.

They’re right. This wasn’t merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it’s far tamer than that.

Indeed, judging by what we’ve seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we’re seeing elsewhere in the world, we’ll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That’s because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide–the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO’s own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required “simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” Severity–that is, the number of deaths–is crucial, because every year flu causes “a global spread of disease.”

Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.

Under fire, the organization is boldly lying about the change, to which anybody with an Internet connection can attest. In a mid-January virtual conference WHO swine flu chief Keiji Fukuda stated: “Did WHO change its definition of a pandemic? The answer is no: WHO did not change its definition.” Two weeks later at a PACE conference he insisted: “Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition.”

They did it; but why?

In part, it was CYA for the WHO. The agency was losing credibility over the refusal of avian flu H5N1 to go pandemic and kill as many as 150 million people worldwide, as its “flu czar” had predicted in 2005.

Around the world nations heeded the warnings and spent vast sums developing vaccines and making other preparations. So when swine flu conveniently trotted in, the WHO essentially crossed out “avian,” inserted “swine,” and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan arrogantly boasted, “The world can now reap the benefits of investments over the last five years in pandemic preparedness.”

But there’s more than bureaucratic self-interest at work here. Bizarrely enough, the WHO has also exploited its phony pandemic to push a hard left political agenda.

In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said “ministers of health” should take advantage of the “devastating impact” swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that “changes in the functioning of the global economy” are needed to “distribute wealth on the basis of” values “like community, solidarity, equity and social justice.” She further declared it should be used as a weapon against “international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs.”

Chan’s dream now lies in tatters. All the WHO has done, says PACE’s Wodart, is to destroy “much of the credibility that they should have, which is invaluable to us if there’s a future scare that might turn out to be a killer on a large scale.”

(This article, which originally appeared in Forbes and was subsequently deleted, is reprinted from Internet Archive.)

Hero image copyright 2024 by W. “Mac” McMeans

EUROPA: The Last Battle

Europa: The Last Battle – All 10 Parts.

Since the mid-20th century, the world has only ever heard one side of the most horrific war in human history. During the 75 years that have now passed, only a single narrative of the great conflict has been heard. This over simplistic narrative totally ignores the previous decades of critical history leading up to World War II, ignores vital information from the actual war years, and outright fabricates lie after lie after lie.

This is the documentary that Europol demanded Gab censor from their site. You might as well see what all the fuss is about.

(Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/H3j90XMIfidR/ )

I Walk Cross The Line

Those who know me know I don’t support Brandon any more than I support The Man In Orange. I neither respect nor vote party faction, because the democrats and republicans individually have little substantive difference, and together they form the uniparty that keeps the country in lockstep with tyranny.

I just don’t play the game anymore.

We are no longer a Representative Republic held in check by the Constitution. We are a fully formed, debauched oligarchy with trappings of our former glory; inhabited more and more by 1) generations who know no better and expect even less; 2) illegals recompensed to invade us; and 3) sell-outs in High Office who answer to nothing more than the perverse filth of foreign money and the agenda of the WEF.

Against this backdrop, it appears DJT wants a term as POTUS that’s above oversight, question or repercussions. Our Declaration was written in response to such despotic whims. Shame on us if we continue to acquiesce to this mindset:

A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION. ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT “CROSS THE LINE” MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN’T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL “ROGUE COP” OR “BAD APPLE.” SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH “GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.” ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE AN EASY DECISION. GOD BLESS THE SUPREME COURT!

If you listen to a man long enough, he’ll tell you his bad intentions. The above Truth from Trump illustrates what he wants: all the power with no questions asked. (A Truth is like a tweet from a twit—only it’s totally true for social media.)

When Donald screams with ALLCAPS that we must live with the “great but slightly imperfect” there’s nothing great about it, because there’s nothing great about a man who wants to sidestep the rules. That all of us are imperfect is a forgone conclusion, and that’s okay: That’s what the rules are for. When you screw up and do things the Constitution prohibits then you’ll be prosecuted. I obviously have no problem with that, and for all his blustering, he shouldn’t either.

His example of the police is very telling. He presents it as an EITHER/OR scenario. Either you accept bad cops doing bad things equally with the good cops doing their job or you have no cops at all. Who in their right mind accepts a premise like that?! Who in their right mind puts forth a justification like that?!

Sure, there will always be bad cops, but we don’t give them a pass when they “cross the line.” We try them and they face justice. The mitigating factor is there are much fewer bad cops than good cops. Further, their limited sphere of influence attenuates the effects of corruption. What do the good People of Boise care about some crooked cops in Dayton? They’re not affected by a “bad apple” in the Buckeye State.

But Trump’s police analogy goes out the window when he talks about the size of his POTUS. There is only one president, and his influence is global! When he decides to “cross the line,” that’s it. Damage done. For the country and the world! There’s no mechanism to soften the destruction. No American can fully escape the consequences of a bad actor president. Even if you live overseas, you’re still haunted by the perverse decisions of a faulty chief executive when the natives cast a gimlet eye on you, equating your honor with the lack of it they perceive in your president.

Truly, a despot cannot ask for anything more than power without accountability, and Trump makes clear he cannot (or will not) wield presidential authority with any checks and balances attached. He wants total immunity.

It makes you wonder how all those who came before got the job done, with that irritating Constitution always getting in the way of a president’s “authority and decisiveness.” (Truth be told, many who came before ignored the Constitution just as much as he claims he needs to.)

There’s no question he’s been targeted by court after court just to make an example of him. While I may sympathize with his plight, I’ll never agree to his demands.

No representative of the People gets to “cross the line” with impunity. It’s debatable how “great” he is, but I’m happy to live with “slightly imperfect” because I hold it accountable nonetheless.

Mr. President, the People keep their own counsel and determine “good from bad,” not you. If you can’t do the job and toe the line then we don’t need you in office.

cite: https://archive.ph/1ibea

Hero image and text are copyright 2023 by W. “Mac” McMeans

The Results Of Relentless Acquiescence

If you pick almost any cross-section of 100,000 people, you’ll notice 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗼𝗻, just under the skin.

A solid 99,990 of them will 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴.

Barbarisms such as forced medical interventions, democide, the forfeiture of basic human rights (privacy, speech, defense, movement); they’ll go along to get along, happily surrendering their own honor and the future survival of their children.

Sounds bad, doesn’t it? It is bad!

Chains in perpetuity

These are the boot lickers Sam Adams castigated; the ones on whom chains might lightly set. But interlinked rings of metal by any other name still indicate you’re someone’s chattel.

Worse still, this group of slaves will fight the unslaved—the ten—tooth and nail, viciously turning on them over nothing more than a difference of perspective. It’s as if they want to be enslaved and hate anyone who suggests that might not be the way to co-exist.

That’s the 99,990.

Fortunately, of the remaining ten, one sees things for what they are (the watchman on the wall) and calls it out. The nine are just as discerning and hear the call to arms, but only one has time to respond. The other eight are too timid or self-absorbed to lift a finger, even though they all see, understand and acknowledge the dire truth of the warning.

Interestingly, these eight truly think they’re serving their peers best by continually re-stating the problem, ad nauseum. They have no intention of fixing anything. No intention of joining in the fray. Doing this costs them nothing, but it makes them feel good. Almost as if they’ve actually helped.

This is the twisted caricature of human existence the watchman faces—a damnable stonewall of schisms. Almost impregnable, it is solid bricks of apathy several generations thick held together by the mortar of combined indifference: the only cement strong enough to withstand years of torture and abuse. And nobody, but nobody wants to do anything except make the wall stronger.

The last thing you do is show a slave his cage when he’s accustomed to the chains.

So all told, out of 100,000 people, the watchman finds but a single ally.

A handful sees what he sees but willingly do nothing.

Tens of thousands more see nothing at all and willingly go to the slaughterhouse.

You can’t help those who won’t defend themselves. As they’re slowly and methodically herded onto cattle cars, the most you can do is quietly pray they’ll meet a swift demise at the abattoir.

You know now what they’ll know soon: The last thing they’ll see at their final resting place will be the coiled concertina and barbed wire of painful, relentless acquiescence—the avalanche of things they gave in to, the sum of which led them to this.

I’ll be clear: Our response to our despotic government has nothing to do with the need to be sure of victory before we resist. It’s about standing up against tyranny, regardless of the projected consequences.

TL;DR – We don’t need to be concerned over the outcome. We need to be very concerned that we’re not. Even. Fighting.

Hero image, caption and text are copyright 2023 by W. “Mac” McMeans

We Dance, You Die!

The Rona.

While hospitals were crying they were filled to overflowing (they weren’t), they coded patients as “presumed” COVID.

All for that sweet government cabbage.

The CARES Act authorized a temporary 20 percent increase in reimbursements from Medicare for COVID-19 patients, so the more the merrier. Further, the government paid triple for any patient placed on a respirator! So while Governor Baker (MA) started back-dating death certificates, Governor Cuomo (NY) ordered 30,000 unneeded respirators.

Meanwhile, patients with already compromised pulmonary health were hooked up to ventilators that blew their lungs out. They were denied hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin (which work to reduce the effects and length of COVID) and given remdesevir (which doesn’t).

All for that sweet. Gummint. Cabbage.

Sanctioned by the highest levels of government, the whole thing was a sham. Reported statistics were derived from 1) a grossly inflated initial data model; 2) “confirmed” cases determined by medical testing of dubious accuracy; and 3) “confirmed” reports of death requiring no medical testing whatsoever.

Medical personnel who refused to play along with the democide were blackballed, stripped of their license, given their walking papers or all the above.

Patients were murdered by the very co-opted medical machinery designed to prolong life and health. It was loathsome. That they had to die alone was abhorrent. This is the very face of “care.”

Between placing respirators on incoming patients guaranteed “presumed” to have COVID and carting cadavers to the morgue, severely overworked medical staff somehow managed to empty a patient room in which they could carve out some time to block, shoot and edit dancing videos. Because the choreography was vital, the six-foot social distancing order was suspended.

𝐆𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲!
𝘞𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘶𝘻𝘢𝘬 𝘣𝘺 𝘔𝘢𝘤 𝘔𝘤𝘔𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴

We’re happy you’re complying
And we know you’ll soon be dying,
But we’re glad that you’re not trying (yet)
To thwart our plan today!
🎵
We really know what’s best (for you)
Come take an easy test (or two)
Get jabbed at our behest (woo-hoo)
“It’s really safe,” we say!
🎶
Now watch our little dance routine
We kick and scoot and prance on scene
Your health ain’t got a chance: We mean
To end your life today!
🎼
No question that we’re trouble
Your misfortunes we will double
Really hate to burst your bubble
But we’ll ruin your life today!
🎵
Right now you’ll lose your wealth (tee-hee)
And tomorrow, it’s your health (oh, gee)
If by force or just by stealth (come see)
You’ll forfeit all our way!
🎶
Don’t examine what you’ve seen
And don’t you question what we mean
Cuz our decorum is obscene:
We’re gonna dance your life away!

Text copyright 2023 by W. “Mac” McMeans